Thursday, March 29, 2018

Challenge of a Leader: Ensuring Just and Fair Culture within Organization

Photo by Lukas from Pexels https://www.pexels.com/photo/close-up-photo-of-man-wearing-black-suit-jacket-doing-thumbs-up-gesture-684385/


Generally speaking, the first and foremost duty of a leader is to inculcate and promote just and fair business culture in the organization. Commitment shown in this regards not only builds trust of employees on the leadership but also paves way to a systemic improvement in co-ordination and collaboration within organization. Enhanced co-ordination and collaboration can be nurtured to improve value creation within the organization, which gradually improves quality of products and services (offered to customers). Eventually all of these add up towards consolidation of brand perception for the products and services offered by the organization.


Thus, we can say that establishing justice culture is evolutionary in nature, it deals with human experiences and with human interactions (passage of information across individuals). Together all of these attributes, make cultural change (for enhancing justice culture) a matter of consensus and a matter of establishing trust over a period of time. Therefore, every leader knows that it is not easy to change prevailing culture in any organization (more so, if term of the leader is short and pressure to perform is high). If circumstances permit, introduction of design thinking ways to generally tune the organizational culture to the strategic requirements of the organization could offer controlled, calculated and conscious cultural transformation. Professional implementation of design thinking to organizational change would enable a leader get a feel of transformation all along the life-cycle of transformation. For example, it may be possible to understand the way interactions are shifting human behavior or to minutely understand the way employees adapt with the newly introduced changes or (say) the way the cognitive bias of employee’s impact on gong change management.

Resistance to cultural change is an inherent feature of an organization. It is usually observed, within most organizations, there exists an ecosystem functioning in equilibrium serving to the (vested) interests of key stakeholders of the organization, which is usually very well synchronized with prevailing culture of the organization. Many times the vested interests of key stakeholders are aligned to the long term strategic interest of the organization but on certain occasions this alignment had withered away due to gradual changes in the environment. The withering away of alignment is often associated with increasing personal interest of dominant players, which creates hidden power centers influencing the organizational decision making and organizational governance. In such circumstances, realignment of with new culture is coupled with enhanced resistance to change.

A sensible leader quickly identifies different actors in the work environment, develops understanding on different aspects like the organizational design, the mechanism of operations, the characteristics of organizational dynamics and most importantly her own role in the entire gamut of things (along with her privileges and her limitations). Once a leader has got into grooves and positioned herself into the leadership position, she should give deep thought about how to streamline the organization towards achieving its objectives following the practice of a just and fair culture. Usually, it is left to leader to deal with the circumstances (both internal to the organization and external to it) and to execute cultural changes required for achieving business objectives of the organization.

In present landscape of business world, the design of organizational administration still appear to be influenced with classical organizations confirming with Fordism and Taylorism. So, it is expected from the leaders to control the organization by adhering to administrative framework laid out in organizational rules and by practicing administrative privileges. However, sensible leaders know very well that forceful measures to make the things fall in place through administrative privileges (enjoyed by the leader) do not result in institutional change and do not work towards consolidation of the organization as a cohesive force adhering to the organizational strategy for value creation. Mostly, in this regards, experts suggest that exploring possibilities for ways to increase pay-offs from just and fair practices within the organization works in the larger interest organization. 

Perhaps, organizational change could be considered for promoting characteristic changes to the organization. In response to dynamically changing external and internal factors, organizations are consistently challenged to keep on changing (mostly for excellence or at times for existence). Usually, organizational transitions in response to such changes are planned, controlled and incremental in nature but on certain occasions, organizations have to respond with major transformations, which could be characterized as rapid, random and voluminous. These transitions and transformations bring opportunity to re-orient existing shared values of organization and to establish new normal with redefined benchmarks and realigned processes (in line with core organizational values). While managing such transitions and transformations to the organization, sensible leaders make conscious efforts to bring intended cultural change and to re-enforce key cultural values.  

In my opinion, one key differentiating factor amongst those leaders who get success in ensuring just and fair business culture in organization and those who do not, is the passion to build an ethical organization, which can bring change to the business landscape through excellence.

But, what could possibly be a few most dominant characteristics of an organization broadly having achieved just and fair work culture? There could be many peculiar characteristics people suggest, however the ones I found most appealing, are as under:-

a.     Fair Processes with functioning Organizational Checks and Balances
b.    Transparency within the Organization
c.     Policy Driven Distribution of Organizational Resources
d.    Mutual Trust and Fair Competition amongst the Employees
e.  Sense of Ownership and Responsibility within Organization


References and Other Related Materials:-

1.     How to use design thinking to change cultures
2.     Getting beyond the BS of leadership literature
3.     EU Charter for Fundamental Rights – Article 31
4.     Why It’s So Hard to Be Fair
5.     Proof That Positive Work Cultures Are More Productive

Tuesday, February 13, 2018

Problems of Pedestrians on Roads of Indian Cities




The following points illustrate the problems of pedestrians on roads of Indian cities with some of the related facts and figures.



1.     It is NOT safe to walk on roads in Indian cities – It is not easy, safe or healthy to walk on roads in Indian Cities. Urban planning in the country seems to have failed to accommodate for pedestrian amenities required for a citizen to choose walking as a preferred option to commute. Rapid urbanization and massive industrialization have contributed to taking air pollution in India to alarming levels, which makes walking on roads difficult for citizens. Civic bodies appear to be ineffective in efforts to address the day-to-day problems faced by pedestrians. And, society at large doesn’t seems to be concerned about the very basic privilege of a citizen to walk on the road with dignity and pride. 



On the other hand, Indian roads are extremely polluted. Data available on pollution are alarming. India is ranked amongst nations with highest level of air pollution in a recently published data by International Energy Agency and World Health Organization. The Picture - 1 below illustrates the same. Further, as shown in Picture – 2, India happens to be amongst the nations with highest number of deaths from air pollution. The next picture (Picture - 3 below), shows that ten out of the fifteen most polluted cities of the world are Indian cities (as per 2014 data published by WHO). Most of these cities are not amongst the metro cities or mega cities but are amongst Tier-II cities.


Picture – 1: Nations with Highest & Lowest Pollutions (Reference - https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/02/the-best-and-worst-countries-for-air-pollution-and-electricity-use)

Picture – 2: Nations with Most & Least Deaths from Air Pollution (Reference - https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/02/the-best-and-worst-countries-for-air-pollution-and-electricity-use)

Picture – 3: Worlds most polluted cities are in India (Reference - http://www.thehawk.in/news/these-are-the-15-most-polluted-cities-in-the-world ; Source – WHO, 2014)


2.     Interestingly, studies suggest Indians are also amongst the nationals having least average-daily-walking-steps (refer Picture - 4) - Despite the fact that most of the parts of the country has got good weather to walk most of the time round the year, we Indians do not walk as much as (most of) other nationals walk.  Stanford University analysis published in the journal Nature, we Indians are officially among the laziest people in the world. The study ranks India at 39 after comparing the walking patterns of 46 countries. The picture below (Picture - 4) is a good visualization on walking pattern of some of the countries across the globe. To an otherwise health conscious urban population, the issues of pedestrian safety and the issue of air pollution may surely be contributing reasons to poor walking figures illustrated in the graph (Picture - 4). This correlation (between conditions for walking on roads and average-daily-walking-steps for any region) may worth investigating by researchers.

Picture - 4: Average Daily Walking Steps across the Globe (Reference - https://www.scoopwhoop.com/indians-are-among-the-laziest-people-in-the-world-because-we-dont-like-to-walk/#.9f42jyzz5 published July 14, 2017; Source – Tim Althoff, Stanford)

3.     Nevertheless, everyday over a fifth of non-agricultural working class walks to their workplace in IndiaOver a fifth of  200 million working Indians (who are neither employed in agriculture nor in household industries) commute to work on foot, followed by commutes by cycle, moped or motorcycle and bus, new data from the Census shows (refer – Picture - 5). More illustration on mode of transportation of working population in megacities is given in the following picture (refer - Picture – 6).

But, in the other picture (Picture – 7), the census data also shows that in India most of the commuter to work place walk less than 5 kilometers (approximately 6,600 steps, assuming 1 kilometer = 1,320 steps). This is far less than 8000 – 10,000 steps of daily activity recommended by most of the reputed agencies related to healthcare (reference - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3197470/table/T1/ )

Picture – 5: Non-Agriculture Workers Commute to Workplace (Reference - http://www.thehindu.com/data/india-walks-to-work-census/article7874521.ece; Source – Census Data)

Picture – 6: Commuting in India’s Megacities (Reference - http://www.thehindu.com/data/india-walks-to-work-census/article7874521.ece; Source – Census Data)

Picture – 7: Mode wise distance wise commute to work place in India (Reference - http://www.india.uitp.org/articles/mobility-in-rural-india; Source - Census data)



Anyhow, it is a known fact that in comparison to relatively better economies (China or Western Europe), there exist a significant gender disparity in India across a spectrum of development indicators (Picture - 8).

Picture – 8: Gender Disparity in India (Reference: http://indianexpress.com/article/explained/how-india-ranks-on-gender-parity-and-why/ ; Source: Mckinsey Global Institute Report, 2015)

Therefore, there is a likelihood that observed gender disparity in walking pattern could be just reflection of larger gender disparity prevailing in society. Many studies suggests that vulnerability of women pedestrian in developing countries (like India) have close link with existing socio-cultural conditions. Thus, in addition to general factors limiting women pedestrian like road congestion, exposure to crowding, air and noise pollution, inaccessibility, the other risks are violence, crime and sexual harassment (Seedat, MacKenzie, & Mohan, 2006). 

Nevertheless, it is important for countries across the globe to work towards gender equality. It may be noted that narrowing the gender gap at work could add $28tn to the global economy by 2025 (according to a research by Mckinsey conducted in 2015).

It may sound convincing that the causes of observed gender disparity in data of pedestrians on Indian roads be rooted on existing socio-cultural conditions. So, efforts should be made to address the causes and effects may automatically start improving. But, there could also be merit in the converse argument. Thus, the possibility of bringing changes to socio-cultural conditions (for gender equality) by making Indian roads much safer for women could also be possible, at least to some extent. May be, because, there could be link between socio-cultural norms and insecure environment for the issues like gender disparity. Researches in this direction at different levels and under diverse conditions may be helpful in conclusive deducing any associated link and its characteristics.


Roads are amongst the important urban Public Spaces in Indian cities. Diversity and dynamism on Indian roads portray picture of a society full of life and vigor. However, these roads also reflect that this public space (roads) is not being put to use for the larger benefit of all the citizens. The facilities available on the roads do not seem to be doing justice towards pedestrians (who are mostly assumed to represent poorer population).




Now, in the following couple of points, an attempt is made to briefly sum up some of the reasons usually cited for problems of pedestrians on Indian roads:-

1.     Pedestrian is lost in the era of Rapid Urbanization – In recent past, urbanization has taken place at unprecedented pace in India. This has not given the governing agencies time to develop required facilities in a planned manner. The daunting challenge of accelerated pace of urban transformation faced by India can be understood with the available census data on rate of urbanization and on rate of motorization (Picture – 9 and Picture – 10). 

Picture – 9: Rapid Urbanization; (Reference: http://iihs.co.in/knowledge-gateway/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/RF-Working-Paper-Transport_edited_09062015_Final_reduced-size.pdf; Source: Census Data for 2011)

Picture - 10: Growth of Registered Vehicles in India (Reference: http://iihs.co.in/knowledge-gateway/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/RF-Working-Paper-Transport_edited_09062015_Final_reduced-size.pdf; Source: Census Data for 2011)

Workers moving to urban clusters for better job opportunities is an age old story. Cities have always been thought as engine of economic growth and prosperity. Traditional view of linking urbanization to job creation and to economic development was dominant in past decades in India and therefore, it was not possible to restrict, to resist or to control (with the intent of systematically organizing) the pace of urbanization in this poor country with consistently increasing population.

In view of exploding expansion of cities and rate of motorization, appropriate planning of road facilities, which may do justice with pedestrians could not be conceived, planned and executed. Eventually, the concerns of pedestrians consistently got ignored to the extent that the roads of Indian cities became extremely unsafe for them. 

But, new researches indicate that building urban infrastructure, enacting directed policies, encouraging management of knowledge capital and promoting entrepreneurship could make the real difference for maximizing economic advantage from urbanization. There is no simple linear relationship between urbanization and economic growth, or between city size and productivity. The potential of urbanization to promote growth is likely to depend on how conducive the infrastructure and institutional settings are. Removing barriers to rural–urban mobility may enable economic growth, but the benefits will be much larger with supportive policies, markets and infrastructure investments. Cities should use realistic population projections as the basis for investing in public infrastructure and implementing supportive land policies. Governments should seek out ways of enabling forms of urbanization that contribute to growth, poverty reduction and environmental sustainability, rather than encouraging (or discouraging) urbanization per se. Thus, it is suggested that, to capitalize on the benefits of urbanization (that has happened) so far, a strategic planning with due considerations to inclusive development and to a just and fair distribution of scarce urban public spaces will be critical. This can not exclude suitable infrastructure with enabling technology to address the issues of pedestrians.

2.     Challenging Dynamics of Urban Infrastructure Development 


In the days of rapid urbanization, urban public space is a scarce resource and it is important to plan its utilization for inclusive development of a city. Roads are the most important urban public space in developing countries like India. Ensuring access to roads to different mode of transportation in such a way that pedestrian can walk safely and more importantly with dignity and pride should be utmost priority of urban planners. This is possible only when planners understand dynamics of road traffic and public behavior on roads to much greater depth. These days advanced systems installed for surveillance (in public places and private places) do produce data for analysis and interpretation of planners. Researches on the related topics may also be promoted for understanding different minute aspects of roads in different areas during different times. 

In many occasions, even with making a choice of best possible solutions, it becomes difficult for roads to accommodate pedestrians due to other dominant mode of transportation and / or due to encroachments of roadside footpath; in such situations, alternate access to pedestrians through pedestrian-walk-ways parallel to roads in the same vicinity may be considered.  

It is widely believed amongst the development sector experts that both public and private agencies entrusted to urban planning and urban infrastructure development in developing countries have temptation to replicate successful urban plans and planning methodologies from advanced countries. In the process, as many people suggest, they often miss basic local needs. Not addressing to pedestrian issues in urban planning in Indian cities is cited as one such case.

Many times governing agencies and administrative bodies responsible for urban development also could not give adequate attention towards urban planning. Some people believe that these organizations function in a work culture which is highly hierarchal, strictly driven from top and very much focused on just getting urban development projects executed and generating output (rather than focused on ensuring objectives are met and impactful outcomes is achieved). Such organizations limit collaborations both within and outside the organization. A few others suggest that political compulsions of democratic governments to do things for public good in chunks of short-term spoils the larger vision of long term planning for urban development.

Another group of people point out that critical civil issues of interest to general public and to larger societal benefits do not get due attention in the prevailing political process in India. Developing consensus among influential political groups or dominant communities to converge for a solution on general issues is usually found to be a difficult task. Mostly, political groups and communities have many issues to address, which relates to the specific interests to these entities. Thus, it takes time and effort to voice civil issues of general public. Problems of pedestrian is considered to be one such issue. 


References:

  • https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281089650_Pedestrian_Safety_and_the_Built_Environment_A_Review_of_the_Risk_Factors
  • https://www.researchgate.net/publication/223853809_The_phenomenology_of_being_a_female_pedestrian_in_an_African_and_an_Asian_city_A_qualitative_investigation
  • http://thecityfix.com/blog/where-are-footpaths-case-protecting-pedestrian-rights-india-himadri-das-sahana-goswami
  • http://www.livemint.com/Science/6rKWVcHEGH6IdN7ghWkLlN/What-is-making-urban-young-India-unhealthy.html
  • http://thecityfix.com/blog/out-of-the-drivers-seat-the-safety-impact-of-auto-rickshaws-on-pedestrians-and-cyclists/
  • http://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011census/B-series/B_28.html
  • http://iihs.co.in/knowledge-gateway/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/RF-Working-Paper-Transport_edited_09062015_Final_reduced-size.pdf 
  • https://www.mahindraworldcity.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Livability-Quotient.pdf
  • http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/maps-and-graphics/Mapped-The-worlds-most-urbanised-countries/
  • http://censusindia.gov.in/2011-prov-results/paper2/data_files/India2/1.%20Data%20Highlight.pdf
  • http://nbr.org/downloads/pdfs/eta/PES_2016_working_paper_shastry_pai.pdf
  • https://paycheck.in/main/career-tips/research-publication/how-much-time-do-indians-spend-on-commuting-to-work-place 
  • https://globalnews.ca/news/3887057/toronto-commute-long-canada/
  • https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/interactive/2013/feb/01/cycle-drive-work-map-census-2011
  • http://www.livemint.com/Opinion/jyFgs0yWYfgFSukwv8NcyH/Is-access-to-transport-slowing-participation-of-women-in-Ind.html
  • https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Dinesh_Mohan2
  • http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0956247813490908
  • https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235962518_Urbanisation_and_Economic_Development_in_India