It has been observedthat most of the e-Governance projects fail. To fully understand the associated
problems could be a topic of research. This blog-post is an attempt to
highlight some of the points, which may be useful for e-Governance project
planners.
1.
Efforts put-up by different Government
Departments towards e-Governance initiatives could be streamlined towards
presenting a Single View of the Government to Citizens through a Central
Program Management Office (for all e-Governance Initiatives).
2.
Identification and Monitoring of
critical success factors could be done through practice of standard IT
(Information Technology) practices - for example
a) matrices
driven project management
b) putting
appropriate checks and balances in project management processes
c) defined
control mechanism rooted in project management process
d) adequate
administrative controls to the project managers
e) developing
practice of data driven decision making throughout project
f) risks
and mitigation planning for the project.
3.
Information Technology could be at the
best an enabler to intent of various government departments to improve
services, analytics and governance at large by making use of electronic means.
Therefore, the onus of implementing departmental e-Governance projects may be
with the concerned department.
Different departments
are at different maturity level in terms of Information Technology Management.
Projects also differ in terms of implementation dynamics. It is difficult to
consistently drive the projects towards intended objectives and to manage
different stakeholders with different perceptions (about the on-going
projects).
At times, some of the
stakeholders (or some of the interest groups) may have ability to influence the
project to much greater extent than they may have been initially thought-out.
Therefore, a domain
expert (a senior subject matter expert from department) could be given
responsibility to lead the e-Governance projects and she/he could be empowered
to independently take decisions in the interest of project.
4.
Central tracking of project metrics
using excel-sheet (or other project management tool) with wider visibility to
all the concerned employees (or if possible to general public at large) may be
helpful in bridging information asymmetry to different stakeholders and also to
consultants to suggest best practices for decision making.
5.
Implementation of fully functional IT
enabled environment (installed applications and other required IT
infrastructure) to support electronic automation aspect of project could be
separated from the job of putting to use the IT environment by the department
(implementing project) to deliver services to the beneficiaries.
6.
Precise mapping of objectives and
results (outcome of each milestone) through a quantified method could be put in
place. And strict evaluation of progress at each milestone with respect to the
mapping may be scheduled, so that, re-assessment of project plan at (the end
of) each milestone could be done to better understand the progress of the
project.
No comments:
Post a Comment